#1
Schwartz, D. L., & Hartman, K. (2007). It is not television anymore: Designing digital video for learning and assessment. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in learning science (pp. 349–366). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Summary:
Schwartz and Hartman argue that digital video should not simply replicate traditional television models but instead be designed intentionally for learning and assessment. They present frameworks for designing educational videos that encourage active interpretation, reflection, and inquiry. The authors also discuss how video-based learning environments can support transfer of knowledge by engaging learners in both observational and participatory modes.
Evaluation:
This chapter provides foundational insights into the pedagogical use of video, moving beyond passive viewing to active cognition. Its theoretical grounding and clear instructional design strategies make it highly relevant for educators seeking to create interactive video-based experiences. However, the examples are somewhat dated technologically, reflecting early 2000s contexts rather than modern streaming or AI-based video systems.
Reflection:
As an educator and instructional designer, I find the authors’ perspective valuable for understanding how to transform video into a dynamic learning tool rather than a passive medium. This directly informs my approach in the Educational Technology program, particularly in designing Engageli or Kaltura-based lessons that promote interactivity, reflection, and assessment integration.
#2
Kay, R. H. (2012). Exploring the use of video podcasts in education: A comprehensive review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 820–831.
Summary:
Kay synthesizes findings from over 50 empirical studies examining the use of video podcasts across educational settings. The review identifies key benefits—such as increased engagement, flexibility, and concept retention—while also addressing challenges like cognitive overload and limited student interaction. Kay concludes that effective use of video podcasts depends heavily on instructional design and alignment with learning outcomes.
Evaluation:
This review is methodically structured and offers a balanced assessment of both opportunities and limitations of video podcasting in education. The inclusion of multiple educational levels and disciplines strengthens its generalizability. While the study’s pre-2012 scope excludes more recent technologies, it establishes a strong baseline for understanding early trends in digital video learning tools.
Reflection:
Kay’s work aligns well with my doctoral focus on optimizing digital media for learning motivation and engagement. His emphasis on design alignment underscores the importance of thoughtful integration rather than mere adoption of technology. This directly informs my ongoing research into video-based feedback and asynchronous engagement strategies in online higher education.
#3
Hung, C. M., Hwang, G. J., & Huang, I. (2012). A project-based digital storytelling approach to improving students’ learning motivation, problem-solving competence and learning achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 368–379.
Summary:
This study explores how digital storytelling, when embedded within a project-based learning framework, enhances students’ motivation, problem-solving ability, and academic achievement. Using a quasi-experimental design with elementary students, the authors found significant gains in learning engagement and conceptual understanding compared to traditional instruction. The digital storytelling process encouraged creativity and deeper reflection on subject matter.
Evaluation:
The research design is robust, combining quantitative and qualitative data to demonstrate meaningful learning outcomes. Its strength lies in connecting digital storytelling to authentic project-based learning, illustrating how technology can serve as both a cognitive and affective scaffold. One limitation is that the study’s focus on younger learners may not fully translate to higher education contexts without adaptation.
Reflection:
This article provides a model for integrating narrative and technology to foster active learning. I plan to apply similar principles in higher education courses by designing digital storytelling projects that allow students to contextualize cybersecurity or data analytics topics creatively. This approach supports learner motivation and bridges theory with applied understanding—key objectives in my teaching and doctoral research.
#4
Yadav, A., Phillips, M. M., Lundeberg, M. A., Koehler, M. J., Hilden, K. H., & Dirkin, K. H. (2011). If a picture is worth a thousand words, is video worth a million? Differences in affective and cognitive processing of video and text cases. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(1), 15–37.
Summary:
Yadav and colleagues compare how students cognitively and emotionally engage with instructional cases presented through video versus text. Their study found that video cases evoke stronger affective responses and situational understanding, while text cases foster more analytical and reflective engagement. The authors argue that both modalities can complement each other when thoughtfully combined in instructional design.
Evaluation:
This article contributes valuable empirical evidence to the discussion of media richness in educational contexts. Its balanced comparison of affective and cognitive engagement provides a nuanced understanding of how different media types influence learning. However, its relatively small sample size and focus on teacher education students may limit the generalizability across disciplines.
Reflection:
This research resonates strongly with my current exploration of how video and interactive media affect learner motivation in online college environments. The findings reinforce my belief that both video and text should be strategically integrated to balance emotional engagement with critical thinking. I plan to use these insights when designing blended assignments that merge case-based video analysis with reflective written components.
Tony Kaczoroski 
Leave a comment